There was public outrage when a magazine published semi-nude pictures of Twins singer Gillian Chung Yan-tung at a concert in Malaysia. Chung was very upset and called on publishers to respect her right to privacy. Other showbiz personalities joined the debate and staged a protest in support of the singer. Although celebrities are public figures, they, too, have feelings, and need privacy.
Have you heard the rumors that '90s Brit-pop legends Oasis might be reuniting? Of course not, you're probably in the United States, which means you likely didn't even realize they kept making music after "Wonderwall" and "Champagne Supernova" ruined your summer almost two decades ago.
Continue Reading Below Continue Reading Below Advertisement For a handful of folks here in the states like me and just about everyone in England, where Oasis is still popular enough that they set a U.
For everyone else, it's a good reason to revisit all the reasons people learned to hate Oasis so much during their heyday. Relax, ladies, it just means "jerk" in England or whatever.
Kids say it in school and such. If anything, it's England's egregious and continued use of the term "fag" that should offend people.
Continue Reading Below Advertisement Anyway, people don't like the Gallagher brothers much, because the Gallagher brothers aren't very likable. Sure, most of their antics are right in line with the kind of thing that people adored about the Sex Pistols and bands of the like, but for some reason, people are a lot less tolerant of it coming from Oasis.
Is it because Oasis also happens to "borrow" a good portion of their catalog from other artists? So do a lot of people, but to their credit, at least they aren't the Spice Girls with cheap guitars, which is a perfectly accurate description of the Sex Pistols, whether anyone wants to admit it or not.
To me, Oasis has always been Do celebrities deserve much privacy everybody else embodiment of the notion that love conquers all. Including the need for manicured eyebrows. Continue Reading Below Advertisement Sure, if you get them in the same room for more than a few minutes, it's obvious that the two can barely stand to be around each other, but that just makes the fact that they stuck it out long enough to release seven albums over the course of a decade and a half all the more impressive.
No matter how successful a band may be, they don't usually survive one member sitting in the balcony smoking cigarettes, drinking whiskey, and heckling the other members loudly just a few short hours after dropping out of a televised concert with claims of a sore throat.
Continue Reading Below Advertisement Yes, that happened to Oasis, and no, I don't know the exact spot in that 45 minute video where you can see it.
I'm sure some helpful Oasis fan in the comments section will have the answer you seek, though. Anyway, Kurt Cobain would've shot Dave Grohl in the head for pulling a stunt like that, and coming from anyone else, Noel Gallagher most certainly would have as well.
Liam Gallagher is his brother, though, and no matter how much of a bloody cunt he may be, at the end of the day, those two will always love each other.
They even wrote a song about it. No, but only because the proper term is "arseholes" where they come from.
Beyond that, yes, totally. That doesn't make watching them pretend to hate each other any less enjoyable, though. To say that Nancy Grace has an unpleasant personality would be putting it far too mildly. There isn't an adjective that properly reaches the depths of just how uncomfortable it is to hear her talk.
It's something people comment on all the time, and I totally agree. That said, there's always been one thing that's bothered me about how vehemently people hate Nancy Grace.
Continue Reading Below Advertisement Why She Doesn't Deserve It Almost exclusively, Nancy Grace reserves her angry words and general unpleasantness for the perpetrators of heinous crimes and the police and prosecutors who do a terrible job of bringing them to justice.
In a lot of cases, the main source of her anger is the senseless murder of an innocent child. Yes, her voice is grating on the nerves, and her anger comes out sounding more like comedy in a lot of cases, but still, isn't murder the kind of thing we want people getting unreasonably angry about?
Not while the World Cup is on! Continue Reading Below Advertisement I mean, Joan Rivers gets every bit as angry over what Taylor Swift wears on the red carpet, but we just call her a legend. Why isn't anyone mad at her for spending her golden years obsessing over fashion choices?
Continue Reading Below Advertisement Oh, but there's also the part where she milks unfortunate crimes for entertainment purposes, right? Yes, because America's Most Wanted and Cops never had commercials, apparently. Everything on television is there for entertainment, first and foremost.
If there is educational value to be found in something you watch on television, that's because it's programming aimed at people who are entertained by learning shit, not because those are the "good" shows. Nancy Grace wouldn't have a career in television if there wasn't a huge segment of the population that loves to watch courtroom drama unfold in real life.
You do realize people just show up and watch that shit in person, right? Continue Reading Below Advertisement Getting mad at her for calling play-by-play on a court case is no different from getting mad at Al Michaels for doing Sunday Night Football. In both cases, their job is to add commentary to an event that a lot of people want to watch.
I understand that Nancy Grace's delivery doesn't sit well with a lot of people, but so what?
A lot of people thought John Madden was annoying as shit as an announcer, but he kept the job for a whole lot of years nevertheless. Wikipedia Probably because he's the only man on Earth who knows how to properly cook a turducken.
If anything, I'd think people would be a little more understanding when Nancy Grace goes overboard the way she does, given the subject matter she's dealing with.But celebrities don’t really consent to losing their privacy.
That gives it a false sense of legitimacy. There’s no contract that says that in order to . Celebrities, like everyone else, deserve a certain degree of privacy. Jocelyn Heng, Maryknoll Convent School. Not unless they earn it.
In the light of recent events, the public has criticised the mass media for exposing the private lives of celebrities. Celebrities know exactly what they're in for when they sign their contracts.
Aug 17, · Do you like to read about your favorite celebrities in magazine articles?
|They are just like us!||Posted on January 27, by roba Should celebrities who break the law face stricter penalties?|
|Recommended For Your Pleasure||Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Get Access Do Celebrities deserve as much privacy as everybody else?|
Do you like to know about their personal affairs?? Do celebrities deserve privacy? show.. that's their prerogative but everyone else that wants to keep their personal life private should be able to.
Some manage to do this easily and others may be Status: Resolved. Do Celebrities deserve as much privacy as everybody else? Essay Celebrities are constantly in the media for their outrageous or strange antics. Do Celebrities deserve as much privacy as everybody else?
Essay Sample. Celebrities are constantly in the media for their outrageous or strange antics. People such as Robbie Williams, The Cheeky Girls and most Big Brother contestants are well known for their headline grabbing shenanigans.
But some stars complain that they do not get the privacy they deserve. Hollywood is the land of beautiful people, celebrities who are admired for their good, often perfect looks.
But you might be surprised to learn which of the biggest stars sport scars — or where.